Senator Rand Paul Will Vote Against Trump’s National Emergency Declaration

Rand Paul
by Henry Rogers

 

Kentucky Republican Sen. Rand Paul said he will vote against a resolution in an attempt to terminate President Donald Trump’s national emergency for border wall funding.

Paul will join a group of three Republicans who have expressed their concerns with Trump’s declaration for a national emergency, saying they do not believe the president should be allowed to override Congress to such a degree.

“I can’t vote to give extraconstitutional powers to the President,” Paul said, to the Bowling Green Daily News Saturday. “I can’t vote to give the President the power to spend money that hasn’t been appropriated by Congress,” he continued. “We may want more money for border security, but Congress didn’t authorize it. If we take away those checks and balances, it’s a dangerous thing.” He was speaking to the Warren County Republican Party.

In the group are Republican Sens. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Thom Tillis of North Carolina and Susan Collins of Maine.

“As a U.S. senator, I cannot justify providing the executive with more ways to bypass Congress,” Tillis wrote in an op-ed for The Washington Post. “As a conservative, I cannot endorse a precedent that I know future left-wing presidents will exploit to advance radical policies that will erode economic and individual freedoms.”

Murkowski said Tuesday she would vote for the resolution, making it clear that the bill will pass the Senate due to support from these Republicans.

Collins said Wednesday she supports a lawsuit challenging Trump’s national emergency, adding that she plans to vote for the congressional resolution.

Democrats in the House of Representatives introduced the resolution Friday to block Trump’s national emergency that could allow him to build a wall on the southern border.

Democratic Texas Rep. Joaquin Castro introduced the resolution, which he said will pass the House, as 222 cosponsors have jumped on board. Castro sent out a tweet saying his resolution would terminate Trump’s national emergency. Democrats only need 218 supporters to pass the resolution.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi sent a letter to her colleagues Thursday, telling them they need to “move swiftly to pass this bill.”

This comes just days after Democratic Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, a 2020 hopeful, listed of a number of issues for which she would declare a national emergency if elected president, including “climate change, gun violence, student loan debt — right off the top. That’s what we ought to be working on.”

Trump will still have the option to veto the resolution if passed by the Senate.

– – –

Henry Rogers  is a reporter at Daily Caller News Foundation. Follow Rodgers On Twitter.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected].

Related posts

3 Thoughts to “Senator Rand Paul Will Vote Against Trump’s National Emergency Declaration”

  1. 83ragtop50

    So, Mr. Paul – please explain why you and your fellow senators did not provide funding when the GOP controlled Congress. President Trump is simply attempting to do what he promised when he was elected – without your help or the other GOP elite. You are am embarrassment.

    1. Linda Green

      I totally agree. We expect you to support our President “

  2. Ron W

    A 1976 law allows the President to do this. I like Senator Paul, but he needs to call for the law’s repeal. While opposing the President to use the law to “protect the States against Invasion” which is directly pursuant Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution, Democrats have already said a Democratic President could use it to enact gun control and VIOLATE the Bill of Rights!!!

    Also as I understand, the law allows a President to declare martial law and, in do doing, violate the Constitution since there is NO delegated power of such in the Constitution. And according g to the 10th Amendment of the Bill of Rights, without Constitutional delegated powers, the President and the Federal Go vernment may do NOTHING!!

    Senator Paul, I’m a Constitutionalist as you claim to be, so that is what you should do.

Comments