SMOKING GUN: TDOE Document Shows Williamson County Schools Delivering ‘White Privilege’ In-Service Training in Violation of State Law

Find what drives you at Beaman Auto!

Williamson County School System officials apparently went against Tennessee law when they imposed an in-service training curriculum that preached “white privilege” and other social justice causes.

They did this, of course, through a new Williamson County Schools Cultural Competency series of videos.

Tennessee Code Annotated Section 49-6-3004 makes it clear that every superintendent of a public school district in Tennessee must submit an in-service training plan that has been approved by the local school board to the TDOE by June 1 of the preceding academic year, and that the Commissioner of Education must approve that plan: (emphasis added)

“In-service days shall be used according to a plan recommended by the local superintendent of schools in accordance with the provisions of this section and other applicable statutes, and adopted by the local board of education. A copy of this plan shall be filed with the State Commissioner of Education on or before June 1 the preceding school year and approved by him.” (emphasis added)

The Tennessee Star asked the Tennessee Department of Education (TDOE) to provide a copy of the in-service training plan for this school year (2018-2019) that, by law, Superintendent Mike Looney was supposed to file with the state before June 1, 2018, as well as a copy of the document that would show the submitted plan had been approved by the Commissioner of Education.

The Star asked the TDOE for this plan through an open records request.

On Wednesday, TDOE officials finally complied — and the only thing they gave us was a calendar outlying days set aside for, among other things, In-service teacher training, holidays, and parent-teacher conferences.

“Please see the below calendar that Williamson County Schools submitted to TDOE for 2018-2019. This is the only record we have responsive to your request,” TDOE’s Nikkie Kiene told The Star in an emailed statement received on Wednesday.

Note that the calendar is merely a simple schedule of event types organized in chronological order beginning on August 3, 2018 and continuing until May 24, 2019. It is not a plan of in-service training, which is a detailed description of exactly what concepts will be taught on each in-service training day, and does not include schedule information for the twelve other event types; Instructional Days, Other Holiday, etc.(emphasis added)

The law clearly specifies that a plan must be submitted, not a calendar. (emphasis added)

You can see that calendar document submitted by Williamson County Schools to the TDOE on May 7, 2018 (and displayed in three parts in this article) here:

Here is an overall summary of total days by event type in the calendar document submitted by Williamson County Schools to the TDOE on May 7, 2018:

Here is a summary of the timeline of submission and approval of the calendar document submitted by Williamson County Schools to the TDOE on May 7, 2018::

None of what the TDOE handed over had any detailed information about the types of In-service training plans the school system was to carry out or what those training plans would require.

Nowhere did it say anything about a “Cultural Competency” series. Nowhere did it say anything about Looney or the education commissioner approving the plan.

Bottom line, it’s a calendar and not a detailed plan.

According to state law, county school board members were to approve the plan, and Looney was to file it with the TDOE before June 1 of last year.

As The Star reported, school board members refused to comment on the issue earlier this week.

On Wednesday morning, The Star sent an email to Looney, school system spokeswoman Carol Birdsong, and school system General Counsel Jason Golden requesting comment on the matter.

Here’s what we asked of them:

“We are preparing a story with evidence that the Williamson County Schools is currently delivering its white privilege In-Service training in violation of state law. The Tennessee Department of Education has provided documentation that shows you have submitted no such plan but have submitted only a calendar that does not comply with the state law. Can you provide a comment for our story tonight, on deadline by 7 p.m. this (Wednesday) evening?”

None of them returned our messages before Wednesday evening’s deadline concerning whether this plan complies with Tennessee law.

The Star also contacted TDOE General Counsel Christy Ballard Wednesday and asked her about the three kinds of categories as they pertain to in-service teacher training. Those three categories are:

  • In-Service
  • In-Service Optional
  • Stockpile Professional Development

Specifically, we wanted Ballard to define what each of those days meant.

We also asked Ballard:

“We are preparing a story with evidence that the Williamson County Schools is currently delivering its white privilege In-Service training in violation of state law. Your department has today provided documentation that shows the Williamson County School System has submitted no such plan but has submitted only a calendar — the aforementioned calendar — that does not comply with the state law.”
“Can you provide a comment for our story tonight, on deadline by 7 p.m. this (Wednesday) evening?”

 

Ballard did not return requests for comment before the stated deadline of Wednesday evening.

According to the information provided, county school system teachers had regular in-service training days Aug. 6-8. They had Stockpile Professional Development on Jan. 3-4 and again on Feb. 18. The teachers had in-service optional training Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday of this week, March 18 to March 20.

It appears that Williamson County Schools brought in a national expert, Horacio Sanchez, to speak during the August in-service training days. His appearance in August is mentioned in Module 1 of the Williamson County Schools Cultural Competency series video.

It further appears that Module 1 was delivered system wide to teachers on January 3, 2018, the first of three “Stockpile Professional Development Days, Module 2 was delivered system-wide on January 4, 2019, the second of three “Stockpile Professional Development Days,” and Module 3 was delivered system-wide on February 18, 2019, the third and final “Stockpile Professional Development Days.

According to comments made to parents by WCS superintendent Mike Looney, Module 4 appears to have been modified during the past week. A possible time during which this fourth and final module may have been delivered system-wide was Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday of this week (March 18 to March 20), which were designated as in-service optional days in the Williamson County Schools calendar.

Notably, the delivery of the Williamson County Schools Cultural Competency video series to teachers appears to have also violated that portion of Tennessee Code Annotated Section 49-6-3004, which requires that the in-service plan prepared by the superintendent be “adopted by the local board of education” prior to its submission for approval to the TDOE and the Commissioner of Education.

As The Star reported earlier in this week, we contacted all twelve members of the Williamson County School Board, asking them to provide evidence that the group had approved an in-service plan for academic year 2018-2019, and none of the members responded to that question.

Lacking the presentation of such evidence, it is not unreasonable to assume it does not exist.

‘Cultural Competency’ Videos

As The Star reported last week, in Modules No. 1 and No. 2 of the Williamson County Schools Cultural Competency video series, teachers are told the term “illegal alien” is “oppressive.”

But that’s just one example among many of a leftist, politically correct narrative that school system officials try to drill into their teachers through these videos.

Also, as reported, Module No. 3 tried to indoctrinate teachers on how to teach students about “white privilege.”

The In-service training video, this one 26 minutes in, profiled several people whom the video described as “Williamson County Voices.”

Later, the narrator told viewers “that white individuals do enjoy unearned advantages that society does not necessarily offer to individuals of color.”

Also, as The Star reported, Williamson County officials had the ultimate power to approve an In-service “white privilege” training curriculum for their teachers last month, said Chandler Hooper, a spokeswoman for the Tennessee Department of Education.

But that’s inconsistent with the TDOE’s standards and practices on In-service teacher training, as specified on that department’s website.

Tennessee’s education commissioner, according to the rules, has the final say approving any In-service training plans. Local school system officials submit those plans to the education commissioner months before the start of the new school year.

As reported, the Williamson County School System is serious about prioritizing its In-Service teacher training, so much so administrators spent 22 percent more on it for this 2018-19 school year versus the prior one. According to the school system’s budget, administrators spent $689,989 on their In-Service/Staff Development training this school year.

For the 2017-18 school year, administrators budgeted $564,508. This school year’s budget for the In-Service teacher training is a 57 percent increase over what it got in the 2013-14 school year, $439,847.

– – –
Chris Butler is an investigative journalist at The Tennessee Star. Follow Chris on Facebook. Email tips to chrisbutlerjournalist@gmail.com.

Related posts

10 Thoughts to “SMOKING GUN: TDOE Document Shows Williamson County Schools Delivering ‘White Privilege’ In-Service Training in Violation of State Law”

  1. not2day

    Maybe Mr. Looney should seek employment elsewhere.

  2. David

    This areticle is race-bating. SHAME ON YOU. Stop promalgating HATE and division.

  3. […] The Tennessee Star reported earlier this month, that section of Tennessee law, “makes it clear that every superintendent […]

  4. No one is talking about taking these people to court. I think it is time.

  5. Donna Black

    I certainly wasn’t handed any opportunities handed to me. I grew up in a blue collar household and we struggled for anything we had. I worked hard to get good grades in school, but couldn’t afford to go to college. I had to get out and look for a job. No one handed me anything! If someone had. I might be rich by now. Instead, my husband is in blue collar worker and we just now are able to see the light at the end of the tunnel. WHITE PRIVILEGE, yeah right!!+

    1. Peggy Curtis

      YOUR 100% CORRECT. White Privilege teaching is a PRE-MEDITATED shaming of WHITES who have made this country great and who work 2 or more jobs to support those here ILLEGALLY on a lifetime of welfare, who are the real privileged. WHITE HATE/WHITE PRIVILEGE discrimination attacks on whites is rampant. TO LEARN that our schools are indoctrinating other races to HATE WHITES is OBSCENE and this indoctrination of OUR school children against whites MUST END OR THEY NEED TO BE SUED.,

  6. Butch Mays

    I haven’t seen any comments concerning when Metro Davidson County’s top Education job was vacant, where Mr. Looney applied for / interviewed for / was picked first to get the job. As I remember it, Mr. Looney came back to Williamson and recieved a nice raise in pay to stay here. It appeared to me that he was never really interested in the Davidson County job in the first place but went through that process to get a raise. Am I remembering this correctly? Seems like we have us a very highly paid loser.

  7. Steve Allen

    Liberalism at its best. If you don’t like the rules, ignore them. Or in the case of President Trump beating Clinton in the election, just change the rules by doing away with the electoral college.

  8. Habu

    Maybe it’s time to “clean house”.

  9. M. Flatt

    I keep hearing about these “opportunities offered to white people that are not offered to people of color.” Has someone actually listed those as a definitive primer of what those “privileges” actually are? Who is the author of that book, essay, or pamphlet on those inequalities?
    I wouldn’t mind a little extra “education” on the matter, if nothing more to understand what these “victims” are complaining about.

Comments