Harvard President Requests Even More Corrections to Her Academic Work as Plagiarism Accusations Mount

Claudine Gay
by Brandon Poulter

 

Harvard President Claudine Gay will request three new corrections to her Ph.D. dissertation following multiple plagiarism allegations, according to The Harvard Crimson.

Gay (pictured above) submitted two corrections to academic articles Friday involving “quotation marks and citations” but was the subject of fresh plagiarism allegations on Tuesday. Now, Gay is submitting additional corrections following a review undertaken by the Harvard Corporation, the university’s highest governing board; however, the Corporation said Gay’s actions did not constitute serious wrongdoing, according to the Crimson.

The Corporation said a review of Gay’s works conducted after plagiarism accusations in October — which resulted in Gay requesting corrections in early December  “found no violation of Harvard’s standards for research misconduct.” But fresh plagiarism allegations released Tuesday accused Gay of over 40 instances of plagiarism in several of her works.

The new corrections do not address all of the plagiarism allegations. The first round of corrections also did not address all of the allegations at the time, including several examples from when Gay was a student, according to CNN.

Harvard’s student newspaper reviewed Gay’s papers in early December and found that some of her scholarly works could have violated the university’s academic dishonesty policies.

The Harvard Corporation previously admitted that they had known of the accusations since late October, though they didn’t make a public statement about the matter until Dec. 12. The Corporation has not called Gay’s works acts of plagiarism, and major left-leaning news outlets have now publicly questioned the university’s decision to do so, including the Boston Globe and CNN.

Yes, Every Kid

Gay came under fire following comments made at the House Education Committee Dec. 5, where she, University of Pennsylvania President Liz Magill and Massachusetts Institute of Technology President Sally Kornbluth refused to say if calling for the genocide of Jews constituted violations of the universities’ codes of conduct. The House Education Committee opened an investigation into all three colleges’ “learning environments, policies, and disciplinary procedures” following the hearing.

The committee expanded its investigation into Harvard to include the accusations of plagiarism against Gay Wednesday.

Harvard’s Honor Council reviewed 138 cases of “academic integrity cases” during the 2020-2021 school year and 99 of them resulted in an “academic dishonesty violation.” Over 27 students were forced to withdraw from Harvard due to “academic dishonesty violations,” which includes plagiarism.

Harvard and Gay did not immediately respond to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.

– – –

Brandon Poulter is a reporter at Daily Caller News Foundation.
Photo “Claudine Gay” by Jon Chase/Harvard Staff Photographer.

 

 

 

 


Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected].

Related posts

2 Thoughts to “Harvard President Requests Even More Corrections to Her Academic Work as Plagiarism Accusations Mount”

  1. Rocky

    I do not like Gay and if she did plagiarize, then she should be held accountable as all others in the World of Academia and Politics.
    Also, show me the documents to back the allegations.
    Until then, it’s a he said she said mess.
    Funny how those that were the creators of this situation are now the loudest doing the loudest crying.

  2. Steve Allen

    This is the classic example of race based admissions at the highest level. While I do not know Ms. Gay and mean no disrespect to her personally, this whole issue reeks of politically correct BS. She had to plagiarizer other peoples work to attain her position. IMO she was given preferential consideration because of her gender and the color of her skin. Liberalism at its best.

Comments