Study: Climate Change ‘Skeptics’ Are More Eco-Friendly Than ‘Alarmists’

  • 16
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

by Jason Hopkins

 

A recently released study suggests those less concerned with climate change practice more eco-friendly habits than those who are more alarmed about the issue.

In an April study published in the Journal of Environmental Psychology, University of Michigan psychology graduate student Michael Hall researched the behavioral differences between people who hold varying degrees of concern toward climate change. Hall, over the course of one year, examined 600 different Americans who “regularly reported their climate change beliefs, pro-environmental behavior, and other climate-change related measures.”

Daily Caller News FoundationThe report divided subjects into three groups: “Highly Concerned,” “Cautiously Worried” and “Skeptical.” Additionally, the report measured how frequently subjects participated in “green” behavior: using public transportation, purchasing environmentally friendly products, using reusable shopping bags, and recycling.

Unsurprisingly, Americans in the “skeptical” category were most opposed to enacting government regulations to address climate change. Those in the “Highly Concerned” category were much more in favor of government intervention. A surprising find in the study, however, was these same skeptics were “most likely to report engaging in individual-level pro-environmental behaviors.” Hall and his colleagues found these behaviors to be consistent throughout the year.

While it is difficult to pinpoint the exact reasons for someone to be strongly supportive of environmental regulations but not live a more environmentally friendly lifestyle, the phenomenon known as moral licensing is likely a factor. People will typically engage in “bad” behavior if they feel they have earned their good graces with another action. In regard to Hollywood actors and progressive politicians, the hypocritical lifestyles of climate alarmists have been well documented.

Famous climate alarmist Al Gore visited Washington, D.C., on April 24 to tell reporters oil companies should be investigated for polluting the world — he promptly left the event in a gas-powered Lincoln sedan. New York Democratic candidate for Congress Gareth Rhodes has made the environment a focal point of his campaign this election season — doing so while traversing his district in a 1999 Ford Winnebago. Hollywood millionaire Leonardo DiCaprio is able to attend climate change protests when he isn’t flying in personal jets or partying on 470-foot yachts.

 – – –

Jason Hopkins is a reporter for Daily Caller News Foundation. Follow Jason on Twitter.

 

 

 

 


 

The Daily Caller News Foundation is working hard to balance out a biased American media. For as little as $3, you can help the DCNF. Make a one-time donation to support the quality, independent journalism of The Daily Caller News Foundation. The DCNF is not dependent on commercial or political support and they do not accept government funding.
Click here for more information and to contribute.

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Related posts

One Thought to “Study: Climate Change ‘Skeptics’ Are More Eco-Friendly Than ‘Alarmists’”

  1. Dave Allen

    It’s too bad those who comment hear seem more committed to vilifying liberals than to protecting the wellbeing of their own children and grandchildren. Unfortunately, whether Al Gore or other “Greenies” walk their walk has no bearing on the imminent and scientifically validated threats Climate Change poses for all of us. Nor does it matter which political party we belong to; all will be equally screwed. Six separate surveys of approximately 15,000 published papers on climate change found that 97% of climate scientist agree that human use of fossil fuels is rapidly warming our planet and disrupting our climate? Maybe we should spend less time to pointing fingers and more time working to quickly make the transition to cheap renewable energy like solar and wind.

Comments