Georgia Democrat Gubernatorial Candidate Stacey Abrams Refuses To Reveal Source Of Million-Dollar Donations

Stacey Abrams
Find what drives you at Beaman Auto!
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
by Jason Hopkins

 

Stacey Abrams, the Democratic nominee in Georgia’s gubernatorial election, is refusing to disclose the origin of millions of dollars donated to two foundations that helped propel her political career.

Former Georgia House of Representatives Minority Leader Stacey Abrams is remaining mum on who funded two tax exempt non-profit organizations. Voter Access Institute and Third Sector Development, both created and led by the Democrat, received a total of $12.5 million in donations from 2013 to 2016. The purpose of Voter Access Institute was to locate “low-propensity” voters and persuade them to go to the polls. Third Sector Development organized a voter-registration initiative that targeted people of color.

The two foundations paid Abrams nearly half a million dollars over the course of three years and introduced the former state representative to a national fundraising network. However, the gubernatorial nominee has refused to publish the names of donors involved in her non-profit work.

In response to media inquiry, the campaign wouldn’t explain the reasoning behind withholding the names, but instead took a swipe at Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp, her Republican opponent in the election.

“I’m proud of New Georgia Project’s efforts to register, advocate for, and mobilize hundreds of thousands of Georgians and successfully combat voter suppression being perpetrated by Secretary of State Brian Kemp,” read a campaign statement from Abrams, according to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

The non-profits accomplished little in reaching their implicit goals, despite the large amount of money involved. The Georgia Democratic Party only received 3 percent more votes in the 2014 gubernatorial election than in 2010. Black voter turnout actually declined by more than two percentage points.

Despite the lackluster performance, the two organizations helped Abrams obtain an extensive network of progressive donors before her long-planned run for governor. A former Democratic candidate, speaking on the condition of anonymity, told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution that the groups’ work “100 percent, no doubt” set the foundation for her run for statewide office.

Federal law does not require Abrams to publicly identify donors to tax-exempt non-profits. However, many similar organizations choose to disclose their donor list.

Abrams has taken criticism on the campaign trail for her struggles with massive personal debt. The Democratic nominee has accumulated hundreds of thousands of dollars of debt on credit cards, student loans and IRS back taxes. She has attributed much of her debt to a misunderstanding during college of how credit cards worked.

– – –

Jason Hopkins is a reporter at Daily Caller News Foundation. Follow Jason on Twitter.
Photo “Stacey Abrams” by staceyabrams.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected]

Related posts

6 Thoughts to “Georgia Democrat Gubernatorial Candidate Stacey Abrams Refuses To Reveal Source Of Million-Dollar Donations”

  1. Not understanding how credit cards works, makes her a qualified dem candidate for Governor???!!!

  2. jack

    communist democrats up to their dirty methods again.

  3. jack

    communist democrats always lie cheat and steal when they think they can.communist democrats are not to be believed,trusted or listened to.vote republican and help save America values and freedom.the communist democrats want to raise taxes open our borders to drug dealers criminal and kinds of rotten people who don’t care about America or its people.

  4. Betty

    I am not surprised at this strategy, those who use funds donated by undisclosed donors are in essences being bought for an evil and sinister plot to use the candidate for a greater purpose to further their own personal agenda. I would never vote for a person that was bought by big money especially when they are scared to disclose the donors.

  5. Gregory

    Could it be that Soros contributed to her campaign?

    1. Virginia

      Yes it could be Soros or Mayor Bottoms of Atlanta taking tax money to help.

Comments