Top Line Claim In Newest Climate Report Relies on Research Tied to Major Dem Donors

Find what drives you at Beaman Auto!
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
by Michael Bastasch

 

It’s been repeated throughout the media — future global warming could wipe-out one-tenth of the U.S. economy by 2100. It’s a top line finding of a major government climate report, but it’s based on a study funded by groups affiliated with two major Democratic donors.

The oft-repeated claim also stemmed from a global warming projection that’s come under increased scrutiny from experts, including one who called it “outlandish.”

The federal government released the second volume of the National Climate Assessment (NCA) Friday. The federal report issued dire warnings, including from “ice sheet disintegration on accelerated sea level rise, leading to widespread effects on coastal development lasting thousands of years.”

The report also claims that “global greenhouse gas emissions is expected to cause substantial net damage to the U.S. economy throughout this century,” including a 10 percent hit to gross domestic product (GDP) in one extreme scenario.

However, NCA’s dire prediction of a 10 percent hit to U.S. GDP comes from a 2017 study supported by the charitable foundations founded by major Democratic donors. The study was also funded by other organizations, including the National Science Foundation, the U.S. Department of Energy and the Skoll Global Threats Fund.

That 2017 study, published in the journal Science, was funded in part by Bloomberg Philanthropies and Next Generation, which were founded by former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and San Francisco billionaire Tom Steyer, respectively.

University of Colorado professor Roger Pielke, Jr. pointed out problems with the study on Twitter Saturday, including the fact it was funded by groups connected with Bloomberg and Steyer.

Bloomberg and Steyer were the biggest donors to Democratic-aligned political action groups in the 2016 election cycle, according to the Center for Responsive Politics (CRP).

Bloomberg, who founded Bloomberg Philanthropies, handed nearly $60 million to liberal SuperPACs to help put Democratic candidates in office and defeat Republicans in the 2018 election cycle, according to the CRP.

Steyer, who co-founded Next Generation, gave roughly $58.7 million to liberal SuperPACs, according to CRP. Bloomberg and Steyer back the Paris climate accord and Obama-era policies to phase out fossil fuels.

The Bloomberg-Steyer-funded study found future temperature rise could cost “roughly 1.2% of gross domestic product per additional one degree Celsius increase on average.” At the most extreme high-end, that could add up to 10 percent of GDP by 2100.

Pielke called the use of such an extreme scenario “embarrassing” because it’s based on a future that’s 15 degrees Fahrenheit warmer — in other words, twice what the United Nations’ most extreme scenario projects.

But even the United Nations’ worst-case scenario, called RCP8.5, is being called into question by experts. A study published in 2017 found RCP8.5 was “exceptionally unlikely” because it suffered from “systematic errors in fossil production outlooks.”

“Imagine if research funded by Exxon was sole basis for claims. Given weaknesses of the work it’s just foolish to lean on it so much,” Pielke tweeted.

Major media outlets’ however, did no such examination of the NCA’s reliance on such an “outlandish” claim, as Pielke called it.

CNN reported “the economy could lose hundreds of billions of dollars — or, in the worst-case scenario, more than 10% of its GDP” by 2100. The news outlets’ headline warned future warming could also “kill thousands.”

“All told, the report says, climate change could slash up to a tenth of gross domestic product by 2100, more than double the losses of the Great Recession a decade ago,” The New York Times reported of the NCA.

Andrew Light, a distinguished senior fellow at the World Resources Institute and reviewer of the chapter highlighting the Bloomberg-Steyer-funded study did not respond to The Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.

Instead, Light forwarded The DCNF’s request to the U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP), which is responsible for producing the NCA. USGCRP has yet to respond to The DCNF’s request.

The NCA was put together with input from 13 federal agencies and outside scientists.

– – –

Michael Bastasch is a reporter for the Daily Caller News Foundation.  Follow Michael on Facebook and Twitter

Photo “Tom Steyer” by Tom Steyer’s Facebook page.
 

 

 

 

 

 


Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

Related posts

One Thought to “Top Line Claim In Newest Climate Report Relies on Research Tied to Major Dem Donors”

  1. Steve Allen

    The predictions regarding climate change might as well be coming from a fortune teller. These dire predictions have been made since the 1970s, and as we chronologically passed the dooms day dates, they did not come true. As this article states, the Left is pushing the climate change alarmist agenda more than ever. As with so many other planks in the Liberal Democratic platform, they are in lockstep with the United Nations. Gun control, climate change, unrestricted world migration, smart growth, and the list goes on. In the case of climate change, the UN’s plan is to tax the wealthy West and redistribute the monies to the poorer countries while at the same time skimming off funds to maintain their organization. In 2017, of all the countries that signed on to the Paris Agreement to reduce CO2 emissions, the United States was THE ONLY COUNTRY to reduce its CO2 output. You would think that the Left would be glad to hear that and proclaim that we are headed on the right direction. But no, it’s more of the same doom and gloom.

    There are many exo-terrestrial forces acting upon the earth that we have no control over. To continually state that humanity is to be responsible for (yet to happen) changes to the planet without a deeper understanding of these forces is not the result of scientific research, it’s political posturing in support of the redistribution of wealth. For example, the sun appears to entering a deep sunspot minimum that was last experienced during the middle ages. We are only just beginning to understand the effects these cyclical sunspot variations on our planet. New studies using satellite data show that the Earth’s thermosphere, the region 60 miles above the earth’s surface, is cooling at a rate not previously seen. What effect this will have on the Earth is yet to be known.

    While we should be concerned about the quality of life on our planet and maintain good stewardship, we must not fall for the never ending political grandstanding and chicken little mentality used by the Left to promote the UN’s global addenda.
    Steve Allen
    Johnson City, TN

Comments