JC Bowman Commentary: Parent Dress Code and Inappropriate Behavior

Find what drives you at Beaman Auto!
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

I have been fascinated by a piece of legislation being suggested by Tennessee Representative Antonio Parkinson on a parental dress code.  We should welcome the discussion.  The legislation is not necessary.  It offers nothing that law enforcement could not already do.

Apparently in Memphis-Shelby County, parents are going on school grounds dressed in inappropriate attire, or as Rep. Parkinson describes one case: “a parent coming in with lingerie on and body parts still visible to everyone.”  We can all agree that is inappropriate.  Here is the problem:  we already have laws on the books designed to address public indecency for adults.   In Tennessee, individuals commit “indecent exposure” when he or she, in a public place or on the private premises of another, intentionally exposes his or her genitals or buttocks or engages in sexual acts and reasonably expects the acts to be viewed by others. The acts offend an ordinary viewer, and are for the arousal and gratification of the individual.

An individual can also be charged with indecent exposure if he or she knowingly engages in sexual acts in his or her own residence, in the presence of a child, for the purpose of sexual arousal (Tennessee Code Annotated §39-13-511).  The punishment for public indecency or indecent exposure includes fines and/or jail time. For the first or second offense, public indecency is a Class B misdemeanor punishable by a fine of $500.  If you are convicted of three or more indecent exposure charges, you will have to register as a sex offender.  If you are a school employee or an adult on school grounds and witness another adult engaged in indecent exposure please notify school administration, the appropriate law enforcement agency, including the school resource officer, immediately.  Passing legislation is not necessary, if we simply enforce the indecent exposure laws already on the books.

Engaged parents are critical partners in student success.  But we must expect adults to follow local, state and federal laws.  This would also include appropriate behavior.   Tennessee law already prohibits a variety of behaviors that annoy or disrupt other people in public.  These categories of offenses found in Title 39 of the Tennessee Code Annotated (T.C.A.): general offenses, offenses against the person, offenses against property, offenses against the family, offenses against the administration of government, and offenses against the public health, safety and welfare were revised and modernized in 1989.  Perhaps they should be updated?

Violations of public peace and safety in Tennessee include:  1) Public intoxication: Appearing under the influence of alcohol or drugs, causing unreasonable annoyance or endangerment; 2) Disorderly conduct: Threatening behavior, creating hazardous conditions, being unreasonably noisy or fighting;  3) Civil rights intimidation: Threatening or injuring someone to prevent him or her from exercising rights or privileges;  and, 4) Obstructing a passageway: Obstructing a sidewalk, highway, hallway or elevator.  If parents are engaged in any of these behaviors, then it is a matter for law enforcement.  Our schools have a difficult enough time managing the behavior issues of students.  Managing the criminal behavior of adults is the primary role and responsibility of law enforcement.

The 111th General Assembly must address real issues facing all of our public schools.  We should focus on three major priorities: 1) Strengthening the foundations of a quality system; 2) Getting our students ready to enter the workforce; and 3) Embracing innovation.  I applaud Representative Parkinson for speaking up on an issue that is impacting the schools in his district.  I hope he will encourage school officials in his district to work with law enforcement and address criminal behavior.  We must have high moral standards in our schools.  So, let’s simply enforce the law that already exists.  On that we can all agree.

– – –

JC Bowman is the Executive Director of Professional Educators of Tennessee, a non-partisan teacher association headquartered in Nashville, Tennessee. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is hereby granted, provided that the author and the association are properly cited. For more information on this subject or any education issue please contact Professional Educators of Tennessee.
Photo “Kid with Parents” by U.S. Air Force photo/Staff Sgt. Rob Hazelett.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Related posts

4 Thoughts to “JC Bowman Commentary: Parent Dress Code and Inappropriate Behavior”

  1. I guess we will just have to agree to disagree on this one. There are laws on the books that go un-enforced, it is not the classroom teacher or school secretary’s job to step into the role of law enforcement. I can only hope SRO’s know when an adult enter the school grounds or is at least aware. if it is inappropriate on the school grounds, it is inappropriate in other place in public. I suspect 99% of parents do the right thing. Teachers are already leaving the field in staggering numbers. This would just add more to their plates. Do you want teachers issuing speeding tickets in schools zones or enforcing the no cell phone laws? Think this one through. Thanks for the thoughts!

  2. 83ragtop50

    I am all in favor of protecting the educators but at some point a line must be drawn. SRO’s and other such officials cannot be everywhere. I think it is time to take a stand and deal with the legal issues as they arise. That in itself may force additional legislative action to address the abuse.

  3. 83ragtop50

    I cannot understand where directly addressing an apparent unsavory behavior on public school property is inappropriate. Such action does not preclude the legislature from conducting other important school issues.

  4. The other issue: Liability. With all the things educators are already responsible for, this latest proposal, will simply add more work on our already over-burdened educators and para-professionals. Rather than put it in TCA Code 49—Education. Put it where it belongs, and is already addressed in TCA Code 39— Legal. Yes, the law needs updating there. We all know that educators will get sued, abused and targeted for telling some parent or guardian to leave campus for a dress code violation. With SRO’s and other Law Enforcement already there, I think it makes perfect sense to let them issue the citation and deal with the legal system on this matter. That makes more sense to me. What do you think?

Comments