Democrats Say They Will Pack the Court if Republicans Vote to Replace Ginsburg in 2020

Find what drives you at Beaman Auto!
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
by Peter Hasson

 

Prominent Democrats are threatening to expand the size of the Supreme Court to cancel out President Donald Trump’s court picks if Republicans vote on late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s replacement this year.

Left-wing activists have been pushing Democratic politicians to endorse court-packing since Justice Anthony Kennedy’s 2018 retirement cleared the way for Justice Brett Kavanaugh to join the high court. Some congressional Democrats embraced the idea following Ginsburg’s death Friday night.

“If Sen. McConnell and @SenateGOP were to force through a nominee during the lame duck session—before a new Senate and President can take office—then the incoming Senate should immediately move to expand the Supreme Court,” House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler wrote on Twitter Saturday.

“Filling the SCOTUS vacancy during a lame duck session, after the American people have voted for new leadership, is undemocratic and a clear violation of the public trust in elected officials,” added Nadler, a Democrat from New York.

“Congress would have to act and expanding the court would be the right place to start,” he said.

“If he holds a vote in 2020, we pack the court in 2021,” Democratic Mass. Rep. Joe Kennedy tweeted on Saturday. “It’s that simple.”

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer told his fellow Senate Democrats on Saturday that “nothing is off the table for next year” if Republicans move to fill the vacant seat, CBS News reported.

Democratic Connecticut Sen. Richard Blumenthal echoed Schumer’s rhetoric, tweeting Saturday: “If Republicans recklessly & reprehensibly force a SCOTUS vote before the election—nothing is off the table.”

Trump promised Saturday morning to nominate a new justice “without delay.”

Conservatives on Saturday pushed back on the idea of expanding and packing the Supreme Court.

Republican Tennessee Rep. Chuck Fleischmann warned that packing the court would be “dangerous” and undermine the court as an institution.

“Court packing is a dangerous and shortsighted idea that will delegitimize our institutions — and that’s what the Dems are threatening to do if they don’t get their way,” Fleischmann wrote in a tweet.

“Packing the court would be a greater blow to norms, legitimacy, and our system of government than *anything* Trump has said or done,” National Review editor Rich Lowry wrote on Twitter.

Some liberal voices in the media have expressed support for packing the court.

“So Democrats should threaten to pack the court,” left-wing writer Jill Filopovic argued in a Washington Post op-ed Saturday. “And, if McConnell pushes through a new justice and then Joe Biden wins, they should follow through,” she added.

“One way for Democrats to make clear they will not tolerate Republicans trying to fill this seat in advance of the election would be for them to pledge that, if they take the White House and Senate in November, they will increase the size of the Supreme Court to 13 justices,” University of California, Berkeley School of Law Dean Erwin Chemerinsky wrote in a Los Angeles Times op-ed Saturday.

“Democrats have no choice but to implement structural reforms to the judiciary if they hope to prevent decades of rule by the alt-right in America,” HuffPost reporter Zach Carter wrote in a June 2018 piece following Kennedy’s retirement.

“At a minimum, that will mean expanding the Supreme Court bench to 11 justices under the next Democratic president. Other reforms, including term limits to remove aging conservatives, may well be appropriate,” he added.

But Ginsburg herself rejected packing the court when asked about it last year.

“Nine seems to be a good number. It’s been that way for a long time,” she told NPR in July 2019. “I think it was a bad idea when President Franklin Roosevelt tried to pack the court.”

– – –

Peter Hasson is a reporter at Daily Caller News Foundation.
Photos “Supreme Court” by Kjetil Ree and “RBG” by European University Institute CC2.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected]

Related posts

3 Thoughts to “Democrats Say They Will Pack the Court if Republicans Vote to Replace Ginsburg in 2020”

  1. M. Flatt

    Huh. The assumption that these are making is that the leadership will change.
    They seem to assume they’re going to take over the Senate, and occupy the White House.
    I’m not going to say if they will or won’t. I’m horrible at crystal-ball gazing. I just think it’s presumptuous to assume they have everything locked up.

    By the way, I know it’s not in the Constitution, but how does one add seats to the the Supreme Court? Is that a legislative action requiring both chambers, or is it an executive privilege?

  2. Julie

    The Democrats already said they were going to do this when they are back in power – did we need an official threat? And, if this was reversed they would be nominating someone before the election too. Assuming Trump is re-elected and the Republicans take the house this needs to be addressed legislatively in some way so at least there is some kind of barrier – but by hook or crook they won’t give this up.

  3. Deplorable Bay Stater

    I’ve always held the view that Justice Ginsburg, whatever her personal and professional merit may have been, was simply wrong about everything, because everything she did as a Supreme Court Justice was based on the premise that it was proper for courts to make up new laws and/or change the Constitution whenever they thought it necessary. Since that is a clear violation of her oath to defend the Constitution, she (along with her leftist colleagues) should have been impeached and removed long ago. However, I now discover that she was right about one thing: trying to pack the Court because you don’t like its decisions is a bad idea. It was a bad idea when FDR tried it, and it’s still a bad idea today.

Comments