Twitter Bans Nearly 400 Accounts for Allegedly ‘Undermining NATO’

by Eric Lendrum


On Tuesday, Big Tech giant Twitter announced that it had banned approximately 373 accounts for allegedly posting content that “undermined faith in the NATO alliance and its stability,” as reported by Breitbart.

Twitter claimed that the accounts in question were part of “state-linked information operations” that were supposedly linked to the governments of Russia, Iran, and Armenia. Of the 373, 130 were targeted “based on intel provided by the FBI” that claimed the accounts had attempted to “disrupt the public conversation during the first 2020 U.S. presidential debate.”

They further claimed that another 69 accounts were “reliably tied to Russian state actors,” and 35 accounts were tied to the Armenian government. The latter group of accounts were allegedly “created in order to advance narratives that were targeting Azerbaijan and were geostrategically favorable to the Armenian government.” Twitter continued by saying that these accounts “engaged in spammy activity to gain followers and further amplify this narrative.”

A spokeswoman for the Russian Foreign Ministry, Maria Zakharova, responded by pointing out that “millions of users” could technically be considered “illegitimate” under the criteria listed by Twitter and the FBI. She pointed to the disproportionate influence of Russian accounts that advocate against the government of President Vladimir Putin, led by jailed dissident Alexei Navalny, pointing out that “Navalny’s supporters…certainly influence the United States and the European Union, given the speed at which anti-Russian sanctions are stamped there at the request of ‘agents of influence.’”

– – –

Eric Lendrum reports for American Greatness.








Content created by the Center for American Greatness, Inc. is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a significant audience. For licensing opportunities for our original content, please contact [email protected].

Related posts

One Thought to “Twitter Bans Nearly 400 Accounts for Allegedly ‘Undermining NATO’”

  1. Roger

    I’m still looking for the part of the First Amendment that list the exact speech that’s protected. Social platforms may be private companies, and they may have the right to regulate content across their system, but if that’s true, they should be heavily taxed and all federal protections removed. If our monopoly laws were enforced across net including providers and social media platforms, competition would fix most of the problems we are having.

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.