Top Republicans Seem Open to Some Kind of Gun Control

  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
by Andrew Trunsky

 

Congressional Democrats and President Joe Biden have vowed to act on gun control in the aftermath of two mass shootings that left 18 people dead, but despite their majorities in Congress, Democrats’ proposed bills would be extraordinarily unlikely to overcome a Republican Senate filibuster.

Partisan gridlock on guns is nothing new. No major gun control legislation has passed in over 25 years, when Congress passed a 10-year assault weapons ban under former President Bill Clinton. But despite the constant stalemates, some Republicans have offered alternative plans, meaning that the possibility of some form of bipartisan gun legislation may still exist.

Pennsylvania Republican Sen. Pat Toomey said Tuesday that while he did not think the two bills passed by the House would overcome a filibuster, there was still opportunity for compromise.

“I still support background checks on commercial sales,” Toomey said. “We’re having preliminary conversations and I hope we can get something across the goal line. But, you know, it’s very difficult.”

Toomey and West Virginia Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin cosponsored a bipartisan background checks bill in 2013, the closest Congress has come to passing any broad gun legislation since the 1990s. The bill got 54 votes in Senate, but ultimately fell six votes short of breaking a filibuster.

Even though that bill failed, it likely has a better chance of becoming law than H.R. 8 and H.R. 1446, two bills passed the House last week which expand background checks and extend waiting periods on gun purchases from three to 10 days.

“No, I don’t support what the House passed,” Manchin told reporters Tuesday. “Not at all.”

“I’m basically where Pat Toomey and I have been,” Manchin said, invoking their 2013 bill. “[I support] the most reasonable piece of gun legislation, called Gun Sense, which is basically saying that commercial transactions should be background checked.”

Unlike the Manchin-Toomey bill, H.R. 8 would require background checks for any gun purchase, not just commercial transactions.

Manchin’s comments were echoed by some Senate Republicans, who were optimistic that a compromise could be reached.

“Tightening the background check system is possible,” said Ohio Republican Sen. Rob Portman. “The House bill is too broad and goes too far for the Senate.”

Even Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, who refused to bring the House bills to a vote when they passed last Congress, said during a GOP press conference Tuesday that he was “open to the discussion” of compromising on gun control, though he did not offer specifics.

Republicans also called for action during the Senate Judiciary Committee’s hearing on gun violence Tuesday.

“Thoughts and prayers are not enough. We need action,” said Texas Republican Sen. Ted Cruz, discussing a bill that he brought forward with Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley that would create a federal task force charged with stopping people from buying firearms who had been previously banned from owning them.

But Cruz also accused Democrats of engaging in “ridiculous theater” every time a mass shooting occurred, prompting them to respond and call out Cruz for allegedly putting “poison pills” in his bill that would prevent it from getting Democratic support.

“I want to find something that can pass,” Toomey said Tuesday. “That probably would require something a little bit different. So, we’ll see if we can figure out how to thread that needle.”

– – –

Andrew Trunsky is a reporter at Daily Caller News Foundation.
 

 

 

 


Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected]

Related posts

4 Thoughts to “Top Republicans Seem Open to Some Kind of Gun Control”

  1. 83ragtop50

    I would dispute that these are “top Republicans”. Top RINO’s maybe. But not top Republicans. They have been removed from the real world for so long that they are out of touch with America.

    1. Ron Welch

      Yep, no longer do they support the “guarantee to every State in the union a republican form of government” (Article IV, Section 4). which is the Government operating within the constraints of delegated powers and protecting, instead of violating, ALL of the Bill of Rights for ALL citizens.

    2. Chris Mallory

      The Republicans started as big government, big war, Anti American progressives. Why would you expect them to change their stripes now?

  2. Ron Welch

    Before attempting to pass more gun laws against law abiding, peacable gun owners, prosecute the ones we have like falsifying the ATF 4473 form required for all commercial buyers. It was recently reported the President’s son Hunter Biden, purchased a gun and answered “no” to the question re: being or having been a user of illegal drugs. That us a felony! Prosecute that law!

    Also,, how will “universal background checks” be enforced without violating the 4th and 5th Amendments agai st private citizen transactions? That would VIOLATE the “law of the land” as established by the SCOTUS Miranda decision in 1966:

    “Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them.” ― Miranda v. Arizona (384US436)

    Will our politicians OBEY or ILLEGALLY criminalize tens of millions of us?!

Comments