House Democrats Pass Legislation That Would Make Washington, D.C., Nation’s 51st State

Washington DC
by Casey Harper


Democrats in the House of Representatives passed legislation Thursday that would make Washington, D.C. the 51st state in the union, a move that would almost certainly strengthen the Democrats’ Senate majority and bolster their ranks in the House.

The bill passed, 216-208, without any Republican support.

A Rasmussen poll released in March found only 29% of Americans supported D.C. statehood and 55% opposed it. The rest were unsure.

“In no other democratic nation in the world does the capital city of that nation not have a vote in their parliament,” said House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., “Now our ‘parliament’ is called the Congress. Think of that, in no other democratic nation in the world are their citizens treated unequally in terms of a vote in the parliament of their nation.”

Many constitutional scholars, though, argued D.C. statehood cannot be accomplished through legislation.

“DC statehood can only happen by constitutional amendment,” said Jenna Ellis, who was a legal adviser to former President Donald Trump and is a constitutional law attorney. “The founders designed the district because federal government needs to have independent control over the seat of government. Read Federalist 43.”

The District of Columbia has a population of roughly 700,000, more than Vermont or Wyoming and just a little less than Alaska. The district already has a nonvoting Democratic representative, Eleanor Holmes Norton. She praised the bill’s passage.

“Today’s victory was historic, both for D.C. residents and for the cause of D.C. statehood,” Norton said.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., expressed support for D.C. statehood when it was passed during the Trump administration, but that legislation never gained traction. This time around, the bill faces a difficult road ahead in the Senate.

“It is past time to end the historic disenfranchisement of hundreds of thousands of U.S. citizens and make D.C. a state,” Sen. Schumer said when the provision passed the House last year. “As one of my top priorities when it comes to voting rights and democracy reform, I will keep working in the Senate to secure statehood, full voting rights and full home rule, for D.C. in this Congress and beyond.”

Hoyer, though, also called for an end to the filibuster to get this legislation and their other controversial agenda items to the president’s desk.

“There are no provisions in the Constitution about a filibuster, so, frankly, I think that filibuster rule ought to be eliminated in the United States so that democracy can prevail,” Hoyer said.

The statehood legislation provides that “the commonwealth shall be admitted to the Union on an equal footing with the other states.” That means representation in the House and Senate and notably, more weight in Congress likely going to the Democratic Party.

The residents of Washington voted more than 90% for both Hillary Clinton in 2016 and President Joe Biden in 2020, leaving little doubt about what party their members of Congress would support.

Republicans pointed to this leftward bias as evidence that D.C. statehood is only about expanding Democratic power.

“The Democrats’ D.C. statehood scheme is about two things: consolidating power and enacting radical policies,” said House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif. “The American people see right through this blatant power grab.”

A contingent within the district has pushed for statehood for years under the motto, “taxation without representation,” a reference to the same slogan that united the American colonies against the British during the American Revolution. That motto dons license plates registered in the district today.

“I voted YES for DC statehood,” Rep. Joaquin Castro, D-Texas, wrote on Twitter. “The Districts 700,000 residents, who pay more taxes than 21 states, deserve full representation and an equal voice. No taxation without representation.”

– – –

Casey Harper is a Senior Reporter for the Washington, D.C. Bureau. He previously worked for The Daily Caller, The Hill, and Sinclair Broadcast Group. A graduate of Hillsdale College, Casey’s work has also appeared in Fox News, Fox Business, and USA Today.












Related posts

3 Thoughts to “House Democrats Pass Legislation That Would Make Washington, D.C., Nation’s 51st State”

  1. EdC

    51st state? Why not then the establishment of a Red state capitol?

  2. Bob Marsh

    Hopefully this will not become law and maybe the Supreme Court will knock it down.

    Give the District back to Maryland except for the White House and Capitol Hill area.

  3. Some Dude

    This is unconstitutional. No more, no less.

    The Founding Fathers of, The United States of America, wrote it into the Constitution. Article I, Section 8, which provides explicitly for a national capital that would not be part of a state, nor be treated as a state, but rather a UNIQUE enclave, a NEUTRAL “district” (as in DISTRICT of Columbia!) in which representatives of all the states could meet on an EQUAL footing to conduct the nation’s business.

    If D.C. becomes just another one of the many states… that Uniqueness ends, that Neutrality ends, that District ends, and that Equality ends.

    I wonder… what else will “they”… END?

    Is there really anything left TO end… after “THEY” eliminate those three things and a place… from OUR Constitution?

    As we ponder the answer… realize… there is a limited amount of time to stop this, before it cannot BE stopped.

    Alas, the poor can riot with impunity since they have nothing to lose… while I play the fool to think I have too much to lose… and am too much the coward to risk civil-disobedience, and the subsequent civil-lawsuits taking my million$ away from my family’s futures.

    Perhaps… when all that is TAKEN away from those WITH $omething to lose… perhaps those fools will become The Devil from Revelation. Perhaps those cowards will become The Horsemen. Perhaps this is how it all begi…. or rather, how it all ends.

    PS: I sure am glad to be agnostic.