by Andrew Trunsky
Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer remains undecided about retirement plans, saying in an interview published Friday that there are “many considerations” playing a part in his eventual decision.
“There are a lot of blurred things here, and there are many considerations,” Breyer told The New York Times (NYT). “They form a whole. I’ll make a decision.”
Despite Breyer’s statements, he acknowledges the involvement of politics in his retirement decision. Invoking the late-Justice Antonin Scalia’s words, Breyer stated that achieving his preferred political outcomes “will inevitably be in the psychology” of his final decision.
“[Scalia] said, ‘I don’t want somebody appointed who will just reverse everything I’ve done for the last 25 years,’” Breyer recalled.
Breyer, nominated by President Bill Clinton in 1994, said that he wanted to retire before death, unlike Scalia and the late-Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg.
“I don’t think I’m going to stay there till I die – I hope not,” Breyer said.
He also expressed wariness of proposals to expand the court “to overcome what is now a 6-to-3 conservative majority,” warning those in favor to “think twice, at least.” Breyer warned that expanding the court risks undercutting “public faith in the court” and imperiling “the rule of law.”
“If A can do it, B can do it. And what are you going to have when you have A and B doing it?” Breyer asked. “Nobody really knows, but there’s a risk, and how big a risk do you want to take?”
– – –
Andrew Trunsky is a reporter at Daily Caller News Foundation.
Photo “Stephen Breyer” by The World Affairs Council of Philadelphia. CC BY 2.0.