Commentary: The First Step to Rightsizing Education Spending Is Reforming Teacher Pensions

by Jude Schwalbach


In the past year, Congress has rushed more than $204 billion in federal emergency funds to states to support K-12 schools.

But 23 states had fewer incoming students this fall. This declining enrollment is likely in part due to pandemic-related trends but is also a symptom of changing birth rates and families geographically relocating.

Long-term losses in enrollment can have grave financial ramifications for school districts. Fewer students mean smaller budgets because state funding formulas use enrollment to determine how many dollars a school district will receive each year. Despite declining enrollment and less per-pupil funding, states and school districts are still obligated to fund expensive staff and retiree benefit programs. These programs usually have enormous costs due to underfunded teacher pensions.

For many schools losing students, vast portions of their already shrinking budgets go to paying off growing pension debts. Data finds that employer retirement contributions increased from an average of less than $600 per pupil in the U.S. in 2002 to $1,600 per pupil in 2019.

While spending on employee benefits has steadily increased since 2002, salary expenditures have remained essentially flat. In fact, according to the Reason Foundation’s K-12 Spending Spotlight, per-pupil spending on instructional staff benefits increased by more than 75% on average, and support service staff benefits also grew by nearly 80% per pupil. But salary spending only increased by $153 per student.

Unfortunately for teachers, the increased spending on retirement packages hasn’t resulted in better benefits since most of the money is funneled to pension debt.

It should be noted that increased education spending in some states, like South Carolina, has led to a better-funded pension system. 

However, in other states, student enrollment has not kept pace with pension obligations. For instance, enrollment in New York declined by more than 300,000 students between 2002 and 2019. Despite serving fewer students, the state increased salary and benefits spending for support services and instructional staff. During that time, per-pupil spending on support services staff grew by 55% and 53.7% for instructional staff.

Spending on benefits for instructional staff skyrocketed as New York spent an additional $3,348 more per pupil in 2019 than they did in 2002, increasing education expenditures on teacher benefits by more than 147% since 2002.

New York’s scenario, unfortunately, is not an anomaly. States such as Pennsylvania and Illinois also witnessed massive losses in their K-12 enrollment since 2002, losing 200,000 and 100,000 students, respectively. Yet, despite serving fewer students, pension obligations have forced the states to increase education spending on instructional staff. In fact, both states increased per-pupil expenditures on instructional staff benefits by 177.7% and 174.7%, respectively.

As Chad Aldeman pointed out in Education Next, “Teachers have by far the highest retirement costs, even compared with other public-sector employees. While the average civilian employee receives $1.92 per hour worked for retirement benefits, teachers receive $7.38 per hour in retirement compensation.”

States that are facing declining enrollment should be adaptive and rightsize their education spending. The fact that school districts lost more than 1.4 million K-12 students in 2020 during the pandemic — nearly a three percent dip in enrollment — poignantly emphasizing the need for greater funding flexibility.

However, underfunded teacher pension systems are a barrier to rightsizing and reallocating their education spending.

Reason’s Pension Integrity Project also notes that “this pension debt not only takes funding away from classrooms but could also put future benefits and pay increases in jeopardy.”

Underfunded pension obligations will continue to funnel money away from students unless states begin to undergo pension reforms that create a plan to pay off debt and reduce future risk, as Texas did with its state employees plan in the 2021 legislative session.

Currently, Wisconsin and South Dakota are the only states that have fully funded teacher pension systems.

States should start pension reform by lowering their overly optimistic pension assumed rates of return. Public pension plans have historically fallen short of their investment expectations, and financial experts project that despite outstanding returns in 2021, future rates of return will be low. Policymakers should also provide better communication and transparency to teachers about their pensions to disclose how underfunded their benefits are. For instance, Alaska, Delaware, Maine, Minnesota, and North Dakota provide teachers with projections for future contributions necessary to pay off the systems’ total unfunded liabilities.

States that properly fund their teacher pension liabilities and design effective teacher retirement systems for the future will make education dollars more flexible for future generations. Teacher pension reforms that prioritize realistic expectations and transparency are the key to sustainable and student-centered education spending.

– – –

Jude Schwalbach is an education policy analyst at Reason Foundation.
Photo “Money” by SCR3AMFR3AK. Background Photo “Teacher” by 14995841.









Content created by  RealClearEducation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher. For republishing terms, please contact [email protected].

Related posts

One Thought to “Commentary: The First Step to Rightsizing Education Spending Is Reforming Teacher Pensions”

  1. 83ragtop50

    Why do teachers get pensions? End pensions entirely and set up a 401k for them. They are no better than the other 99% of us who work. I am tired of hearing how they are underpaid. In my view they are overpaid for the product they produce. Don’t believe me, check the latest scores on student competency testing.

    It is not all the fault of teachers. They work in an occupation controlled by out of touch administrators who always get more money (and add administrative positions) with no accountability for results.

    I grimace and groan every time Mr. Lee talks about improving Tennessee’s public education. His only solution is to commandeer more money for a failed operation without any accountability required of those fusing my tax dollars down the toilet. Now they are pushing to revise the formula for how the state computes the level of funding which results in tax dollars are drained off to this failed cause. Anyone care to bet that any such revision would not increase the amount flitted away?