J.C. Bowman Commentary: What Is Next in Tennessee Education

To the outside world, our industrial model public education system has changed very little in the last fifty years. However, those who have worked within the system would challenge that view. Everyone can agree we must have an education system that serves all students, preserves democratic ideals and civic participation, and allows students to succeed in the future economy.

Educators have constantly battled against the false premises that our public schools are failing, that educators are the problem, and that outsiders (usually non-educators) should take control of running our schools. Too many policymakers, including state leaders, have simply bought into the jargon fostered by disruptive education that pushes that agenda. The 113th Tennessee General Assembly has work to do this legislative session.

What’s next in education for Tennessee? We must begin with the obvious. It matters who leads the Tennessee Department of Education. Will Governor Bill Lee re-appoint beleaguered Commissioner of Education Penny Schwinn in his second term? That question will reveal much about what the Lee agenda is moving forward. If he reappoints Commissioner Schwinn, then we will see more of the same policies. If he goes in a different direction, it sends a message that the state can now reset, reimagine, restart, refocus, and rebuild.

Professional Educators of Tennessee has been both supportive and critical of various education initiatives in the last decade. We believe we do not need disruption in education, as much as we need innovation. Our focus must remain on preparing students for life after high school, so students can move seamlessly into a college or career that allows them to live, work, and maintain a living wage as an adult.

Fewer Tennessee students are attending college despite opportunities through programs like Tennessee Promise. Business as usual will not work, and Colleges and Universities will need to evolve and innovate, with people becoming more responsive to their learning. The Brookings Institute pointed out a decade ago, that over “50% of STEM jobs do not require a bachelor’s degree, and almost 50% of students who receive four-year STEM degrees begin their learning at community colleges.” Intangibles such as emotional intelligence, curiosity, creativity, adaptability, resilience, and critical thinking will always be highly valued in public education. Literacy, numeracy, and scientific knowledge will always be essential.

What legislation are we focusing on? First, we will continue our work of increasing the teacher pipeline. This means legislation that helps recruit both new educators and retains existing educators. For recruitment, we are focused on increased funding for out-of-pocket expenses by teachers and looking to assist with childcare stipends for educators with young children. We are also eager to provide mental health assistance and tuition assistance for prospective educators. We will also need to look at the use of licensure exams and other barriers that limit educators.

Second, on the teacher retention front, we are looking at how we can keep veteran teachers beyond thirty years. Representative Iris Rudder will file legislation to allow educators to draw salary and retirement benefits after thirty years in the system. This is like legislation that passed in Florida and Louisiana that will help to keep veteran teachers in the classroom longer. We will continue to seek additional benefits and salary increases to keep educators in the field. We also must continue to address student discipline and excessive teacher workload.

Third, the Tennessee General Assembly will need to adjust the Third-Grade Student Retention Law and make modifications. What that change looks like will depend on several issues. We need to revisit our standards. Simply put, we have too many and it has been a point of contention between educators and policymakers.

We must provide the necessary funding and support for K-2 students before even discussing student retention. To determine interventions, we need some benchmark testing to make sure that we can observe that our K-2 students are on track preceding third grade. We need to take a hard look at school readiness. Data shows students who entered kindergarten at six or older scored about 10 percent higher on the third-grade English Language Arts test than their peers who started school at age five or under.

We need to move summer school back into kindergarten through third grade and expand tutoring. We give the teachers more control over the classrooms to identify kids who are struggling and give students more support to be successful. Waiting until third grade to retain students is too late. The data must be tracked more effectively and be available to policymakers and stakeholders to judge the quality and reliability of interventions.

Finally, we will advocate for a more robust discussion of the transformative power of public education. We must put teachers in a position where they can teach, and students in a position where they can flourish. Our education system works best with parental support and involvement—including at the legislature. Education provides a foundation for life and is a pathway to the future. Like all Tennesseans, state policymakers must frequently ask, “What kind of state or community do we want to live in, work in, and raise our family in? What kind of schools do we need to make this happen?”

We expect a busy legislative session at the Tennessee General Assembly. We look forward to working with legislators, policymakers, and other stakeholders to move our state forward in K-12 education. Our future depends upon our success. Failure is not an option.

– – –

JC Bowman is the Executive Director of Professional Educators of Tennessee, a non-partisan teacher association headquartered in Nashville.



Related posts

One Thought to “J.C. Bowman Commentary: What Is Next in Tennessee Education”

  1. Joe Blow

    The following are my responses to the 3 numbered points in Mr. Bowman’s commentary:

    1) Really? First, stipends for childcare for teachers with young children? They get paid a nice salary already with nice perks and a shot at a retirement package that transcends 90%+% that of American workers. Secondly, I do not know how much out of pocket expenses a teacher has. I assume it varies greatly by school and teacher. But I can tell you right now here in Sumner County, parents are financially dinged for in-class niceties that were once paid for by the school district. On top of that there are many “backpack” pushes to get supposedly needed supplies and other goodies. We are already paying for the classroom stuff, thank you. Maybe some of the “free” lunch programs should be pared back to a reasonable level so that any savings could be applied to the actual classroom needs.

    2) A legitimate way to potentially retain teachers beyond 30 years is to require them to work to then current social security retirement age schedule in order to access retirement funds like the vast majority of other workers must do. Or better yet, put them on a 401K retirement plan like others are forced to use. Everyone knows that pension plans are expensive and a dinosaur in this country.

    3) What’s wrong with expecting teachers to get their students up to a minimum standard by the 3rd grade? It seems that the push to rework the third grade standard is an effort to make the educators (administrator and teachers) look good no matter how the students are performing. I am tired of dealing with teenagers that cannot read nor write much less do simple addition and subtraction. Dumping them on universities and two-year colleges to take remedial classes- at taxpayer expense – is not a solution.

    Finally, I will comment on this statement:
    “We need to move summer school back into kindergarten through third grade and expand tutoring”

    Frankly this is just more of the same old throw old money at it “solution”.

    Once upon a time, even here in rural Tennessee, students graduated with good to excellent reading, writing and mathematical skills without all of the extra spending and coddling. How about taking a look to the past to see what actually worked instead of looking to a future of a more costly and still failed educational system?!

    Thank you for allowing me to comment.