Election Integrity Law Expert Phill Kline Offers Grim Outlook Regarding Security of 2024 Presidential Election

Phill Kline

Phill Kline, former Kansas Attorney General and current law professor at Liberty University School of Law, is not hopeful that this year’s presidential election on November 5 will be conducted fairly or securely.

Kline said many “illegal” tactics used during the 2020 election in Democrat-ruled states are still in place for this year’s election, including widespread access to states’ poll books.

“In 2020… the states themselves often granted what were secret private public contracts to allow leftist organizations to gain access to our poll books,” Kline explained on Monday’s edition of The Michael Patrick Leahy Show.

“We ought to be very concerned when people who are not accountable – they’re not elected officials, they’re not known and identified, they’re not auditable – are able to gain access to our poll books because that data can easily be manipulated,” Kline said.

Kline said widespread access to poll books so that independent organizations can create voter registrations “shouldn’t happen.”

“It’s stunning to me that it’s still being allowed and not raised as a national issue. The private sector should not be able to electronically enter voter registrations. You need to take those to your clerk…Our poll books are just out for people to manipulate. Now, the response that you’ll get from the left is, ‘It’s hard to do – you would need to have a driver’s license matching an identity.’ You’ve got to be kidding me. You can buy driver’s licenses on the dark web. That information is routinely hacked and shared,” Kline said.

“There are poll books that are wide open, and they’re wide open to left leaning organizations…This stuff shouldn’t happen,” Kline added.

When it comes to Republicans pushing back on such tactics through litigation, Kline noted how many courts dismissed suits challenging election outcomes due to lack of standing and, if the cases were decided in favor of Republicans, the rulings were received too late after the election to make a difference in the outcome.

“A lot of lawsuits were thrown out on standing but the ones that were actually reviewed by appellate courts, we won significant victories…Here’s the problem with some of that: they come late. Too late to make a difference,” Kline said.

Kline went on to say that the 2020 election was “managed in such a way” that made it “almost impossible to prove” that there was “substantial evidence of fraud.”

“The election was managed in such a way – unprecedented flow of private money, unprecedented use of absentee ballots, unprecedented ability to introduce ballots into the ballot stream without any human oversight or verification – to make it almost impossible to prove that the election would be different,” Kline explained.

“There’s substantial evidence of fraud and intentionality in turning government offices into partisan turnout centers, that’s illegal, and using illegal methods – such as curing ballots, such as allowing electronic access to poll books by certain people, such as placing one drop box for every four square miles in Democratic strongholds in Pennsylvania and one drop box for every 1,159 miles for every county that Trump won. All of that stuff is good evidence that would necessitate a reasonable investigation. But the left, with media help, was able to stop it,” Kline added.

– – –

Kaitlin Housler is a reporter at The Tennessee Star and The Star News Network. Follow Kaitlin on X / Twitter.
Image Phill Kline by Phil Kline / Bannon’s WarRoom.

 

 

Related posts

Comments