by Robert Schmad ’23
The Union League Club of Chicago, a highly selective private civic and social club in the windy city, invited Nikole Hannah-Jones to give a keynote speech in honor of Martin Luther King Jr. Day.
Jones, a professor at Howard University, is notable for having authored the New York Times’ 1619 Project, a long-form journalistic work that falsely argues America’s true foundation is in the institution of slavery.
Prior to Jones’ speech, a series of emails were leaked in which club members voiced their opposition to hosting Jones at their club. In one email Brian Daley, a Public Affairs Committee member for the club, pointed out that Jones’ 1619 Project had been criticized by historians and that the New York Times issued a “humiliating update” following widespread criticism of her work, according to reporting by Chicago City Wire.
“It will be interesting to hear what Ms. Hannah-Jones has to say,” Daley said in the email obtained by the outlet. “Though whatever else her remarks might contain, we all should hope they do not attempt to resurrect or re-frame the demonstrated and divisive falsehoods promulgated in the 1619 Project.”
He also criticized Jones for being “inflammatory and divisive.”
Chris Robling, another club member who disapproved of Jones’ having been invited, called her a “discredited activist.”
“Ms. Hannah-Jones’ (implicit) theory must be that King, for the layered nuances of his understanding, depiction and use of the Founding, was ignorant of history,” Robling stated. “One needn’t be a student of dialectical and historical materialism — or speculative philosophy of history — to see clearly that Ms. Hannah-Jones, in fact, seeks not to STRENGTHEN our polity but to use false references to exacerbate remaining differences, thus WEAKENING it, for ideological purposes.”
According to the emails, Jones was paid to give her speech which is not typical for individuals invited to speak at the club.
Per Jones’ Twitter account, she was aware of the leaked emails prior to giving her speech. In an attempt to prove her detractors wrong, Jones scrapped her original speech and instead opted to read bits and pieces of MLK’s speech under the illusion that they were her own words. To accomplish this, she says replaced the word “negro” in her MLK excerpts with “black” as to not arouse suspicion. Jones’ goal in doing this was to demonstrate that her ideas and goals are similar to those held by Martin Luther King Jr.
The MLK quotes read by Jones included “The problems of racial injustice and economic injustice cannot be solved without a radical redistribution of political and economic power. A nation that continues year after year to spend more $ on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death” and “Ever since the birth of our nation, White America has had a Schizophrenic personality on the ? of race, she has been torn between selves. A self in which she proudly professes the great principle of democracy and a self in which she madly practices the antithesis of democracy.”
She also read a line that referenced the year 1619, the namesake of her signature work.
“It was in the year 1619 that the first BLACK slave was brought to the shores of this nation. They were brought here from the soils of Africa and unlike the Pilgrim fathers who landed here at Plymouth a year later, they were brought here against their will.” Jones quoted “For more than 200 years Africa was raped and plundered, a native kingdom disorganized, the people and rulers demoralized and throughout slavery the BLACK slaves were treated in a very inhuman form.”
According to Jones, attendees were “SHOOK” after she revealed she had been reading MLKs words the whole time.
I was invited to give an MLK speech today and a small number of members of the group hosting me wrote and then leaked emails opposing my giving this speech, as it dishonored Dr. King for me to do so. They called me a "discredited activist" "unworthy of such association with King"
— Ida Bae Wells (@nhannahjones) January 17, 2022
“Oh, the uncomfortable silence as I read Dr. King’s words at a commemoration of Dr. King’s life when people had no idea that these were his words. When I revealed that everything I said to that point was taken from his speeches between ’56 and 67… Can you say SHOOK,” Hannah-Jones later tweeted regarding the event.”
“Then I read all the names that white Americans called King: charlatan, demagogue, communist, traitor — and brought out the polling showing more than three-quarters of Americans opposed King at his death while 94 percent approve of him now,” she added.
“People who oppose today what he stood for back then do not get to be the arbiters of his legacy,” went on. “The real Dr. King cannot be commodified, homogenized, and white-washed and whatever side you stand on TODAY is the side you would have been back then.”
Jones went on to claim that the 1619 Project is necessary because past scholars have tried to “co-opt” MLK to support their agendas. She also argues that Ronald Reagan, whose name she spelled wrong, had ulterior racist motives when he made MLK day a national holiday.
Campus Reform reached out to the Chicago Union League Club to verify whether Jones account of events on Twitter is accurate. Hannah-Jones was also contacted for comment; this article will be updated accordingly.
– – –
Robert Schmad is a Senior Georgia Campus Correspondent with Campus Reform. He is a junior at Emory University studying political science and statistics. Robert chairs his college’s chapter of the College Republicans and serves as Editor-in-Chief of the Emory Whig. Last summer Robert worked with the Washington Examiner, serving as a commentary intern.
Photo “Nikole Hannah-Jones” by Associação Brasileira de Jornalismo Investigativo. CC BY 2.0.
.jpg){kind=link}
MLK was a republican. To imply otherwise is dishonest. This person is a race hustler of the lowest kind.
She’s definitely a whack job, and getting worse.