Bill Advocating National Popular Vote Draws Support and Criticism in Michigan

Ann Bollin
by Therese Boudreaux

 

A proposed bill could change the way Michigan votes for president.

House Bill 4156 would enter Michigan into the National Popular Vote Compact, an agreement among participating states to elect the president by national popular vote.

This means Michigan, as well as all other compact member states, would pledge to allocate all of its electoral votes to whichever presidential candidate receives the greatest number of votes nationwide, rather than statewide popular vote.

The bill has garnered both fierce opposition and strong support across party lines.

“House Bill 4156 is a dangerous proposal that disenfranchises Michigan voters,” Rep. Ann Bollin (pictured above), R-Brighton Township, said. “The Electoral College ensures presidential candidates campaign across a variety of states, addressing unique regional concerns. Michigan’s urban, suburban, and rural communities deserve to have their voices heard. This legislation would drown out those voices in favor of larger states with massive population centers.”

Pure Integrity for Michigan Elections also opposes the bill, saying “Michigan’s voters would be completely ignored if they don’t happen to vote for the same president as 51% of the country…This bill looks to undo the sovereignty of the state of Michigan by ignoring its voters and selecting instead someone as president that the large cities in the country would choose.”

Gary Wolfram with the Conservatives for National Popular Vote testified in support of the bill.

“It is a compact among the states meant to overcome the shortcomings of the winner-take-all method adopted by all of the states except Maine and Nebraska to decide how their electors will vote within the Electoral College…[currently] presidential campaigns are not national campaigns. One can honestly say that we elect a president of the Battleground States of America, not a president of the United States of America,” he said.

If HB 4156 passes, at least 50 more electoral votes are needed for the NPV Compact to take effect.

– – –

Therese Boudreaux is a contributor for The Center Square.
Photo “Ann Bollin” by State 
Representative Ann Bollin. Background Photo “Michigan Capitol” by Brian Charles Watson CC BY-SA 3.0.

 

 

Related posts

2 Thoughts to “Bill Advocating National Popular Vote Draws Support and Criticism in Michigan”

  1. Steve Farina - level headed conservative

    It is actually called the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact. It clearly violates Article I Section 10 and Article IV Section 4 of the US Constitution.
    I have been attempting to bring this to the attention of our AG, however have not heard or seen anything from his office.
    We need two things:
    1) A coalition of State AGs to fight the NPVIC in court PRIOR to its implementation
    2) A Constitutional Amendment that requires all States to assign their Electors in the manner in which ME and NE currently do (Note: ME has recently signed on to the NPVIC so their method would change with its enactment)

    Please call your State AG and ask him/her to file suit against this unconstitutional inter-state agreement – before it is too late.

  2. Tim Price

    So a few very populated areas of the country get to pick the president?

    Horses***!

Comments