The Tennessee Senate has non-concurred, essentially rejecting the House-passed version of the three-year residency requirement bill for federal candidates in primary elections.
The bill now goes back to the House, where they have the option to conform to the Senate version, or else the legislation goes to conference committee. The state House is expected to consider the legislation again this week.
The Senate added the refusal to the calendar by suspending the rules. If there had been an objection, the motion would not have been heard on Monday.
The Tennessee Star previously reported that the House bill sponsor, State Representative Dave Wright (R-Knoxville), originally stated his plans to make the bills match by motioning to substitute and conform the House version to the Senate version. When the House version came to a vote in its own chamber, the lawmakers then approved the motion to conform to the Senate version with one caveat. Sources told The Star that there was a procedural error made in motioning to substitute and conform the bill to the Senate-passed version. Rep. Wright intended to make the House bill completely conform to the Senate version, but there was a procedural misstep.
The House proceeded to pass an amendment to the legislation that would mandate the law take effect after the November 9, 2022 election, proposing a different effective date than the original Senate version. The Senate seeks to have the legislation take immediate effect. The versions are still in conflict, but that may soon be resolved.
Sources tell The Star that the House is expected to conform to the Senate version, which would set the three-year requirement into effect immediately. It is unclear if that will be the case.
Under that scenario, TN-5’s GOP primary will see the most impact of the new legislation. Carpetbaggers Morgan Ortagus and David Vitalli would be immediately ineligible to run. California native Robby Starbuck would likely be ineligible as well. Starbuck had previously refused to address questions made by The Star about his residency claims.
The Star previously reported that Starbuck had threatened legal action if his eligibility for the TN-5 Republican primary is challenged.
“I‘ve retained a world-class lawyer who has won multiple Supreme Court cases and I’ll deploy them accordingly if anyone’s desperate enough to contest my eligibility,” he said.
“If they do contest my eligibility, I hope they have deep pockets because they’ll end up paying my legal fees after I win. Tennessee was my primary residence in time to meet any new standard that would be set by the law being considered by our legislature if it passes.”
– – –
Aaron Gulbransen is a reporter at The Tennessee Star and The Star News Network. Email tips to [email protected]. Follow Aaron on GETTR.
Photo “Dave Wright” by Lisa Hood Skinner. Background Photo “Tennessee State Capitol” by Andre Porter. CC BY-SA 3.0.
These outsiders, if they attempt a lawsuit, will find that the Big Two really are private political clubs that subsidize their private club elections (called primaries) with taxpayer money, but you have no right to run in them. You will not find private political club primary elections in your constitution, because political parties are not part of it. Starbuck, et al have all rights to join the general election, because being a member of the Big Two private political clubs is not a constitutional requirement. But it is very difficult to get equal treatment on the ballot. The Big Two have seen to that already.
“I‘ve retained a world-class lawyer who has won multiple Supreme Court cases and I’ll deploy them accordingly if anyone’s desperate enough to contest my eligibility,” he said.
Let me guess. They aren’t from Tennessee either?
[…] Senate non-concurred with the House version on March 21 and sent it back to the House. On Monday, the […]
I’ve lived in TN and District 5 for 20 years. Would that make me a good congressman?
No better than if you had not lived there at all. But you would HOPEFULLY have a much better understanding of the culture and preferences of the constituents unlike those who still believe that their support comes from D.C. or California.
Probably better than Jim Cooper.